Skip to main content

SCOTUS! Do We Need It?

So, if the Republicans steal this seat, then we as the people, must decide if the Supreme Court is a necessary place for legal cases to be heard in our perspective Federal Districts. If the people refuse to adhere to the Supreme court rulings; then the power of the Supreme Court doesn't exist.

The law of the land is based on your region? Shouldn't we let those people in their own region determine their own legal structure; where it then will trickle down to local judges and communities. Do we rely too much on the legal institute? Why do we allow aristocrats (rich) people decide upon their own intellectual gatherings of collective idealism; determine how we should live.
Instead shouldn't we of our own right, choose to live without interference; while, giving no harm to any other people, place or thing. If we the people, decide to ignore the SCOTUS; then it shall be what is shall be within our own reality and region. The issues of abortion, marriage, guns rights and any other living rights that don't interfere nor hinder other people. These issues shouldn't be directed to a group of people in Washington.

Do we need to resist and stop having the follower mentality and break away from this collective thinking concept of patriotism to the SCOTUS. In the world of 2017! The people have become more equal in many ways. Is it time to start addressing State, local city and community rights. In order to function without interference from lobbyist and special interest groups; to ignore the political manipulators and career politicians like Congressman Lacy Clay. 

Here is the flip side about having a SCOTUS? Eventually Black-Americans were officially in written form, afforded equal protection and human rights under the law of the this land. Under those provisions came the emergence of rights from all perspectives that included women rights, disability, worker's compensation and other rulings guiding the governmental institutions operating in this country. When people say the 'Good Days' I wonder whom are they referring too. I don't think the brothers in the tree had a good time!

The trade off to no longer having a governing legal body to give guidance might sting. However as the past eight years, since an African-American man became the POTUS. This is a truly divided county that might create a unique new perspective of how this country moves forward. An official agreement of defending this country from aggression from both foreign and domestic threats; would eventually unite the country for that one goal. The country  maybe living upon the separation of powers in the recognition of State and local community rights. However, the trade off might be life in peace and a formation like minded people whom just want a peaceful life.

The only MAJOR problem would be law enforcement in the protection of people whom are different. US history has a negative reality when it comes to Western-European descendant Americans (white folks) and how they treat non-Europeans (black & brown folks).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump? Please Convince Me

I haven't heard anyone come up with a logical reasoning as to why I should support Trump. He will not bring jobs back to America; that ship has sailed and new technology as appeared with cheaper labor and production. He can't deport 11 million people without jamming up the legal system in due process of law nor with the current state of law enforcement in this country. The Terry Stop doesn't allow for the asking or reporting of an immigration status; good luck getting that passed in a Democrat controlled Senate. Trumps ideas of stopping ISIS is unrealistic, when he disrespects the Muslims whom are fighting ISIS overseas.  We can't withdraw our investment to the region financially, because the World Court and United Nations will demand compensation for the War crimes that have been committed by the US in accidental collateral damage in bombings. He wants to tear up the International Trade Deal as if those other countries will now deal with us for violating a signed

The Russia Activity Thing: A Nothing Burger My #%@

People keep asking for the evidence about Trump about his activity, his people and how it pertains to Russia. They state: "show me the proof, what thing is there.". Well my fellow citizens! In law enforecement we call this 'clear and present danger' of criminality and suspicious activity of organized persons or groups in a goal to push an agenda to the detriment to the country (United States of America). These are the things that concern me as they should concern us all. To be clear! These alleged incidents, activity of Trump or his associates has not been clearly entered nor disputed in a court of law, but as an investigator it would trouble me. Here it goes! I don’t know – it’s hard for me to see any U.S. ties to Russia… except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing and the Tillerson thing and the Sessions thing and the Kushner thing and the Carter Page thing and the Roger Stone thing and the Felix Sater thing and the Boris Ephsteyn thing  and the Rosneft thin